My spouse and I dined at Husk Nashville on the Fourth of July holiday
weekend in July 2014. We made our reservation on-line using the Open
Table reservation system. We were surprised that restaurant did not call
us to reconfirm. When we planned our trip to Nashville for the holiday
weekend, we did not realize that our top-choice restaurants (like the
Catbird Seat and Rolf & Daughters) were closed. Although Husk closed
on the holiday itself, it was open on the days preceding and following.
Husk is open daily for weekday lunch, weekend brunch, and dinner. The
original Husk in Charleston has been on our “to dine” list since it
opened. In addition, we read many good things about chef / owner Sean
Brock. Therefore, we were excited to try his Nashville outpost.
Patrons
can walk to Husk from downtown area, particularly if they stay at a
hotel near Broadway (such as the Omni or Hilton). However, because we
stayed at the Doubletree, we took a taxi. The taxi cost $10 and took a
long time because of all the street closures for the holiday street
party. Perhaps on a normal day, you could travel to Husk for $5 or so.
We walked home, which provided good exercise after our filling meal.
The
restaurant is located in a restored home in the Rutledge Hill
neighborhood, just a few blocks south of Broadway. The historic part of
the home adjoins a modern two-story room with a vaulted / cathedral
ceiling and two walls of windows. Two dining rooms exist in the original
house on the street level, along with the kitchen that diners walk past
to reach the lower level. The land on which the restaurant sits slopes
so that the lower level is actually a “walk-out”. Husk has a small bar
and an outdoor patio on the lower level where guests can dine and / or
drink. (If you simply must dine at Husk Nashville and you cannot get a
regular reservation for a standard table, you can dine at the bar.)
Our
server exhibited odd mannerisms and a pretentious attitude. In
addition, we encountered some issues with his actual service. For
example, we each ordered dessert, but the waiter served our dishes in
succession, not concurrently. The waiter apologized for his mistake, and
said that he entered it incorrectly in the computer. We would rather
that he held the first dish until the second was ready instead of having
one of us eat our dessert course while the other person watched, and
then vice-versa. Also, when the waiter delivered our bill, we noticed
that the restaurant charged us for four appetizers (two each of the same
two dishes). In actuality, we ordered only two total appetizers (one of
each dish). This time the waiter blamed the computer system, and he
said that it was not the first time that day that the computer had
double-billed. (If that was the case, then he should have proofread /
reviewed each check before he delivered it.) After hearing and reading
so much about Chef Brock and Husk, we had higher expectations for
service.
As for the food... The restaurant serves freshly baked
and still-warm Parker House rolls and homemade butter as guests peruse
the menu. We shared two appetizers: Husk chicken skins, and crispy pigs
ears, neither of which we adored. Both were a bit too flavorful and / or
spicy for our taste. The portions were enormous, but the dishes were
not delicious enough to make us want to devour every bite. The crispy
chicken skin was not “all that”. In our opinion, a certain famous
fast-food restaurant uses more tasty chicken breading. Regarding the
pigs ears, we felt that both the menu description and the server’s
supplemental information were misleading. When it was delivered, we saw
that this item was really a lettuce-wrap type appetizer, a dish that was
similar in concept to an appetizer that we ate at Merchant’s the
evening before, and therefore, it seemed duplicative rather than
inventive.
Our entrees were more successful than our appetizers.
We selected a pork dish and a beef dish. The pork was served with a
succotash of hominy and butter beans, accompanied by onions. The beef
dish was accompanied by onions and pea shoots. Plating / presentation
was rustic, and the chef used eclectic ingredients. For dessert, we
ordered one chess pie (a custard-type pie accompanied by peaches, cream,
and lemon sorbet), which was average. The waiter delivered the second
dessert (the cheese plate), approximately 15 minutes after the first
dessert arrived. We wonder why the cheese board took so long to prepare
because none of the items required cooking-to-order.
Husk uses
unique serve-ware: some “plates” look like cross-sections cut from logs.
However, the wood slices are so large that it was difficult to fit them
on our small table and still have room for our drinks and cutlery.
Table placement was somewhat tight, too.
We are glad that we
dined at Husk, but we held higher expectations for our overall
experience. Still, patrons receive a good meal at Husk for a fair price.
No comments:
Post a Comment